What is life like with your car? Let us know and win £500 in John Lewis vouchers | No thanks
Are police officers limited in what they can do about vehicle crime?
In response to GJ, the thing to remember is that most vehicle crime is provable and clearly defined. The evidence is usually indisputable. Other crimes, however, are not. Police have to think whether there is a certain chance of conviction. If there isn't, it’s better to at least have them on the system for future reference and ensure a harsher sentence for a re-offender
Asked on 23 June 2012 by AB, Malvern
Answered by
Honest John
This came in from a former senior police officer:
“For the greater part of my service, we hunted down burglars, embezzlers and thieves, prosecuted then ourselves (using OUR solicitor where appropriate but usually the Duty Inspector) and the magistrates sent them to prison. Note, no suspended sentences, no curfews, etc. Then along came the do-gooders who thought prison was a bad idea and that the police were too corrupt to be involved with the prosecution. They brought in the CPS who generally employ unemployable law graduates of low category. They demand evidence to the nth degree and otherwise drop the case. It is now far less hassle for the police (who wants hassle?) to caution, as the alternative is frequently masses of paperwork and for the CPS to say NFA (no further action).
"A Police Caution IS a conviction, which is slight satisfaction when the officer knows the baddy should be doing porridge. I recently volunteered to assist in training police recruits and was astounded that a statement we could have taken on one page in 30 minutes now occupies four pages and takes two hours. No wonder that we all wonder where the Police Force has gone.”
“For the greater part of my service, we hunted down burglars, embezzlers and thieves, prosecuted then ourselves (using OUR solicitor where appropriate but usually the Duty Inspector) and the magistrates sent them to prison. Note, no suspended sentences, no curfews, etc. Then along came the do-gooders who thought prison was a bad idea and that the police were too corrupt to be involved with the prosecution. They brought in the CPS who generally employ unemployable law graduates of low category. They demand evidence to the nth degree and otherwise drop the case. It is now far less hassle for the police (who wants hassle?) to caution, as the alternative is frequently masses of paperwork and for the CPS to say NFA (no further action).
"A Police Caution IS a conviction, which is slight satisfaction when the officer knows the baddy should be doing porridge. I recently volunteered to assist in training police recruits and was astounded that a statement we could have taken on one page in 30 minutes now occupies four pages and takes two hours. No wonder that we all wonder where the Police Force has gone.”
Similar questions
Do the police take car crime as a serious problem? I've just had my van broken into twice in the space of a month, actual damage to repair £2000.The police don't even take fingerprints. Nothing was stolen...
Not all thieves are stupid. A couple of weeks ago a friend told me that someone she knew had their car broken into while they were at a football game. Their car was parked in an area specially allotted...
.jpg)
