What do you think of Elon Musk? Have your say | No thanks
Does the attached correspondence regarding the new Protection of Freedoms bill help at all?
I thought that the attached correspondence from Norman Baker would add to the debate. I had raised the points discussed in your letters column directly with my MP and he has followed this through: it would be interesting to see whether other readers obtained the same response?
Asked on 18 February 2012 by MB, Macclesfield
Answered by
Honest John
Standard pro-format latter. And now too late. The Bill passed its report stage on 8 November. Clause 56 was unamended. The British Parking Association will be setting up an independent appeals scheme to operate from October 2012. Meanwhile, the BPA has asked that if I receive complaints about private parking enforcement that I feel are justified, I should ask readers to register their concern at www.britishparking.co.uk/AOS-Enquiries. You can find the BPA Code of Practice at: www.britishparking.co.uk/Approved-Operator-Scheme-...e.
Similar questions
I have been following the debate on Clause 56 of the Protection of Freedoms bill through your column and have written to my MP (twice) to raise my objections. I finally received a reply from Norman Baker...
Instead of motorists rejoicing that a debate over road fuel prices was triggered by a petition signed by just over 100,000 people, we should be looking upon this as the greatest show of public apathy ever....
Further to your recent columns regarding the relationship between the BPA and the DVLA, and the Protection of Freedoms Bill, I have received the attached letter from Norman Baker via my local MP (Gregory...
Elsewhere on 
.jpg)
