What is life like with your car? Let us know and win £500 in John Lewis vouchers | No thanks

Congester Guardian

Soon the people of Manchester will get the opportunity to vote on the proposed congestion charge rip off. As if having a budget of £3m for an awareness (or propaganda) campaign was not enough. With the vote being only weeks away Manchester now has some very 'Interesting' road works in progress. The diversion routes are unbelievable. They have not even suspended the parking bays. (Greed or what?) They are successfully producing the desired gridlock effect. For many years, Manchester City Council has been preparing for the congestion charge. They have been deliberately creating congestion. They have narrowed the main arteries in and out of the city by installing unnecessary bus and cycle lanes. All the smaller roads are fitted with bollards, speed bumps or ridiculous one way systems. Traffic lights are unsynchronized, and usually incorporate a complete set of pelican crossings, unnecessarily holding up ALL the traffic in every direction. They have completely messed up the city centre with its one-way route system. Other cities in the world have underground or skytrain systems, some (like Bangkok) have both. Manchester installs a tram system in on the roads. Which incidentally is creating even more congestion at the moment because they are relaying the tracks. Maybe the tracks would need less major repairs if they were not being ran over by buses, lorries and cars all the time. Surely it would not take much to employ someone to sit in a room and watch the monitors from the millions of traffic and security cameras and actually switch a traffic light to green when a road gets congested. The estimated annual operating costs of the congestion charge scheme are around £31m. I would happily sit in a room and switch traffic lights to ease traffic flow for say £1m per year. That would leave the council with £30m to squander on some other project. I can’t believe someone is paid to dream this stuff up, then get a nice cushy pension at the end of it.

Asked on 3 January 2009 by

Answered by Honest John
This reads very much like what they did in London under Ken. Traffic
light phasing that kept traffic moving was unphased to cause the
congestion that the congestion TAX allegedy cured. Not only that, payment was made deliberately difficult to the extent that for years the fines income from late payment exceeded the charge income. In London, at least, change is on the way and it will soon be possible to have an account directly deducted every time you enter the zone so you don’t have to go through the rigmarole of paying separately every time. But the real question to be asked is who benefits from all this. In London a major beneficiary appears to be the company responsible for administering the congestion tax. You need to ask some very pertinent questions about that.
Similar questions
In the next few weeks all the people of Manchester will have a vote on the proposed congestion charge. One wonders how much that alone will cost. Below is a copy of a letter I had published in our local...
I live a few streets outside the boundary for the newly reduced congestion zone in central London. Two of my four children go to school in the congestion zone. I don't fancy paying £9 every time I want...
I base my forthcoming comments to you on past media reports, about the London congestion tax. Kulveer Ranger, the mayor’s spokesman on transport matters, has almost admitted that the scrapping of the congestion...