What is life like with your car? Let us know and win £500 in John Lewis vouchers | No thanks
Fine answer
Lots of arrogant persistent lawbreakers (speeders) often complain that speed cameras are a revenue stream for the government. With our huge deficit needing paying back somehow, I'd far rather see these people who knowingly flaunt the law at the same time as putting the rest of us at a higher risk than they need, foot more of the bill than the law-abiding tax payer.
Asked on 4 September 2010 by AL, via email
Answered by
Honest John
Yes, I have frequently advocated speeding fines rising to say £200 a go for transgressions of less than 10mph over the limit, and no points. That would be an excellent revenue earner because it would rarely be challenged. So the "arrogant" speeders would merely pay up. Points cause a problem because they eventually put drivers out of work and make them a burden to the state because they are unable to drive.
Similar questions
I very much enjoy your column. I am a retired Superintendent from the Hong Kong Police. My last 5 years service was spent in charge of a large traffic police unit covering half the territory. Having come...
I was caught by a speed camera doing 36 mph on the A614 somewhere near Howden. This was on an unfamiliar road in light traffic on a quiet Sunday morning, and I was completely unaware at the time. As I...
I 'speak' as a 46year experienced driver (66 years old), never caused an accident, never committed a crime, paid all taxes on time, but nevertheless I have managed 3 points due to a hidden camera. I wonder...
.jpg)
