What is life like with your car? Let us know and win £500 in John Lewis vouchers | No thanks
Elasting band
I'd appreciate your advice on the markedly different lengths of life of cam-belts quoted by various manufacturers. Ford seem to suggest that those fitted to the petrol Fiesta and Focus models should last 10 years or 100,000 miles whereas my 2008 1.4 Seat Ibiza requires changing after just 4 years (my previous Leon was 6 years). Is this just Seat being ultra cautious or are Ford belts so much better quality - and, if so, why is it that a quality manufacturer such as the VAG use sub-standard belts? And, on the subject of cam drives, does the VAG 1.4TSI engine employ belt or chain?
Asked on 29 May 2010 by SO, Sutton
Answered by
Honest John
Manufacturers always overestimate the life of their belts, tensioners,
pulleys and waterpumps until there is a problem. There was with VAG belts on 1.4 16vs and 1.6 16vs because the German engineers (or their accountants) fitted plastic or nylon pulleys that failed, just as they did on GM Opel engines in the 1990s. These routinely failed at around 35k - 45k, so, rather than admit its mistake, VAG sought to profit from the situation by changing the timing belt replacement on
ALL its timing belt engines to 4 years or 40k miles, whichever comes first. It's true, some belts do last a lot longer. And what usually fails is a pulley, tensioner or waterpump driven by the belt rather than the belt itself. But I wouldn't push any beyond 5 years or 80k miles whichever came first. The VAG 1.4TSI is chain cam, with a water cooled turbo.
pulleys and waterpumps until there is a problem. There was with VAG belts on 1.4 16vs and 1.6 16vs because the German engineers (or their accountants) fitted plastic or nylon pulleys that failed, just as they did on GM Opel engines in the 1990s. These routinely failed at around 35k - 45k, so, rather than admit its mistake, VAG sought to profit from the situation by changing the timing belt replacement on
ALL its timing belt engines to 4 years or 40k miles, whichever comes first. It's true, some belts do last a lot longer. And what usually fails is a pulley, tensioner or waterpump driven by the belt rather than the belt itself. But I wouldn't push any beyond 5 years or 80k miles whichever came first. The VAG 1.4TSI is chain cam, with a water cooled turbo.
Similar questions
I am currently driving a 2002 Skoda Fabia 1.4 and have decided to give the car to my daughter. Prior to handover I thought it would be prudent to have a full service so booked it in to my local Skoda dealer....
I have recently bought a one owner 1999 Mercedes 230SLK with 40,000 miles on the clock for a bit of summer motoring. It's a lovely car and I paid £7,995 for it from a good dealer but not a specific Mercedes...
Related models
Cheap to run. five star Euro NCAP rating, clear and simple dash layout. Facelifted with improved engine range from spring 2012.